Cape Verde vs Croatia: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Cape Verde
0.557
in 2025
Croatia
0.543
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
45th
Croatia rank
47th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Cape Verde
- Croatia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0.557 against 0.543 in Croatia, a difference of 0.014.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Croatia ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 45th and Croatia ranks 47th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Croatia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.033 | 0.1237 | 0.0907 | Croatia |
| 1950s | 0.033 | 0.198 | 0.165 | Croatia |
| 1960s | 0.033 | 0.1955 | 0.1625 | Croatia |
| 1970s | 0.112 | 0.1919 | 0.0799 | Croatia |
| 1980s | 0.2594 | 0.2057 | 0.0537 | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 0.5365 | 0.2958 | 0.2407 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.6146 | 0.6345 | 0.0199 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.634 | 0.6473 | 0.0133 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.5835 | 0.5675 | 0.016 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Cape Verde or Croatia?
- Cape Verde, at 0.557 against 0.543 in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Cape Verde and Croatia?
- 0.014, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Croatia?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Croatia rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Cape Verde ranks 45th and Croatia ranks 47th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.