Brazil vs Israel: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Brazil
0.54
in 2025
Israel
0.549
in 2025
Brazil rank
48th
Israel rank
46th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Brazil
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0.549 against 0.54 in Brazil, a difference of 0.009.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 98 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Israel ahead.
Brazil ranks 48th and Israel ranks 46th of 175 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0496 | 0.0566 | 0.007 | Israel |
| 1910s | 0.0504 | 0.0672 | 0.0168 | Israel |
| 1940s | 0.1605 | 0.3345 | 0.174 | Israel |
| 1950s | 0.1667 | 0.4338 | 0.2671 | Israel |
| 1960s | 0.1321 | 0.4713 | 0.3392 | Israel |
| 1970s | 0.1065 | 0.5566 | 0.4501 | Israel |
| 1980s | 0.2288 | 0.602 | 0.3732 | Israel |
| 1990s | 0.5578 | 0.6245 | 0.0667 | Israel |
| 2000s | 0.6083 | 0.6282 | 0.0199 | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.5573 | 0.5933 | 0.036 | Israel |
| 2020s | 0.4762 | 0.5658 | 0.0897 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Brazil or Israel?
- Israel, at 0.549 against 0.54 in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Brazil and Israel?
- 0.009, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Israel?
- 98 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Israel rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Brazil ranks 48th and Israel ranks 46th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.