Bhutan vs Gambia: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Bhutan
0.463
in 2025
Gambia
0.452
in 2025
Bhutan rank
58th
Gambia rank
61st
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Bhutan
- Gambia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.463 against 0.452 in Gambia, a difference of 0.011.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 58th and Gambia ranks 61st of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 9 and Gambia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0847 | 0.058 | 0.0267 | Bhutan |
| 1910s | 0.091 | 0.058 | 0.033 | Bhutan |
| 1920s | 0.0931 | 0.058 | 0.0351 | Bhutan |
| 1930s | 0.098 | 0.059 | 0.039 | Bhutan |
| 1940s | 0.0986 | 0.0648 | 0.0338 | Bhutan |
| 1950s | 0.1091 | 0.0807 | 0.0284 | Bhutan |
| 1960s | 0.1298 | 0.164 | 0.0342 | Gambia |
| 1970s | 0.1391 | 0.253 | 0.1139 | Gambia |
| 1980s | 0.1456 | 0.2698 | 0.1242 | Gambia |
| 1990s | 0.1603 | 0.2047 | 0.0444 | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.2464 | 0.1771 | 0.0693 | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.4807 | 0.2323 | 0.2484 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.4783 | 0.4162 | 0.0622 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Bhutan or Gambia?
- Bhutan, at 0.463 against 0.452 in Gambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Bhutan and Gambia?
- 0.011, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Gambia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Gambia rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Bhutan ranks 58th and Gambia ranks 61st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.