Belarus vs Comoros: Egalitarian Democracy Index

Belarus
0.228
in 2025
Comoros
0.222
in 2025
Belarus rank
108th
Comoros rank
110th

Egalitarian Democracy Index over time

  • Belarus
  • Comoros
00.10.20.30.40.5190019622025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.228 against 0.222 in Comoros, a difference of 0.006.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Comoros ahead.

Belarus ranks 108th and Comoros ranks 110th of 175 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 9 and Comoros in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Comoros Difference Ahead
1900s 0.043 0.045 0.002 Comoros
1910s 0.0493 0.0452 0.004 Belarus
1940s 0.198 0.0605 0.1375 Belarus
1950s 0.2142 0.0656 0.1486 Belarus
1960s 0.2195 0.077 0.1425 Belarus
1970s 0.2232 0.1281 0.0951 Belarus
1980s 0.2246 0.1525 0.0721 Belarus
1990s 0.3945 0.2662 0.1283 Belarus
2000s 0.2716 0.2666 0.005 Belarus
2010s 0.2742 0.2833 0.0091 Comoros
2020s 0.2285 0.221 0.0075 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Belarus or Comoros?
Belarus, at 0.228 against 0.222 in Comoros as of 2025.
What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Belarus and Comoros?
0.006, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Comoros?
94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Comoros rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
Belarus ranks 108th and Comoros ranks 110th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Egalitarian Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.