Bangladesh vs Libya: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Bangladesh
0.115
in 2025
Libya
0.123
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
149th
Libya rank
147th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Bangladesh
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.123 against 0.115 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.008.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 149th and Libya ranks 147th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 6 and Libya in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.0952 | 0.04 | 0.0552 | Bangladesh |
| 1940s | 0.097 | 0.0385 | 0.0585 | Bangladesh |
| 1950s | 0.0862 | 0.1087 | 0.0224 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.0837 | 0.1161 | 0.0324 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.1267 | 0.125 | 0.0017 | Bangladesh |
| 1980s | 0.136 | 0.125 | 0.011 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 0.2052 | 0.125 | 0.0802 | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0.1779 | 0.1249 | 0.053 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.1361 | 0.1975 | 0.0614 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.1035 | 0.136 | 0.0325 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Bangladesh or Libya?
- Libya, at 0.123 against 0.115 in Bangladesh as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Bangladesh and Libya?
- 0.008, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Libya?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Libya rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Bangladesh ranks 149th and Libya ranks 147th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.