Armenia vs Ghana: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Armenia
0.491
in 2025
Ghana
0.493
in 2025
Armenia rank
53rd
Ghana rank
52nd
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Armenia
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0.493 against 0.491 in Armenia, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 53rd and Ghana ranks 52nd of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 10 and Ghana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.153 | 0.058 | 0.095 | Armenia |
| 1920s | 0.1822 | 0.0584 | 0.1238 | Armenia |
| 1930s | 0.1875 | 0.059 | 0.1285 | Armenia |
| 1940s | 0.1875 | 0.0661 | 0.1214 | Armenia |
| 1950s | 0.2142 | 0.1642 | 0.05 | Armenia |
| 1960s | 0.2195 | 0.1877 | 0.0318 | Armenia |
| 1970s | 0.2232 | 0.1648 | 0.0584 | Armenia |
| 1980s | 0.2246 | 0.1696 | 0.055 | Armenia |
| 1990s | 0.4388 | 0.3047 | 0.1341 | Armenia |
| 2000s | 0.2963 | 0.5187 | 0.2224 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.3407 | 0.5405 | 0.1998 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0.551 | 0.4795 | 0.0715 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Armenia or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 0.493 against 0.491 in Armenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Armenia and Ghana?
- 0.002, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Ghana?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Ghana rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Armenia ranks 53rd and Ghana ranks 52nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.