Moldova vs Romania: Distribution of Democracy Index

Moldova
19
in 2018
Romania
19
in 2018
Moldova rank
33rd
Romania rank
33rd

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Moldova
  • Romania
05101520180019092018

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 19 against 19 in Romania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 138 shared years of data; in 1859 it was Romania ahead.

Moldova ranks 33rd and Romania ranks 33rd of 167 countries.

Across the 15 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Romania Difference Ahead
1850s 0 10 10 Romania
1860s 0 6.8 6.8 Romania
1870s 0 3 3 Romania
1880s 0 3 3 Romania
1890s 0 3 3 Romania
1900s 1.8 4 2.2 Romania
1910s 5.67 6 0.3333 Romania
1940s 1 3.44 2.44 Romania
1950s 2.4 3 0.6 Romania
1960s 3 3 0
1970s 3 2.7 0.3 Moldova
1980s 3.4 2.7 0.7 Moldova
1990s 15.7 16.2 0.5 Romania
2000s 18.4 18.6 0.2 Romania
2010s 19 19 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Moldova or Romania?
Moldova, at 19 against 19 in Romania as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Moldova and Romania?
0, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Romania?
138 years are reported by both, from 1859 to 2018.
How do Moldova and Romania rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Moldova ranks 33rd and Romania ranks 33rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).