Luxembourg vs Poland: Distribution of Democracy Index

Luxembourg
20
in 2018
Poland
20
in 2018
Luxembourg rank
1st
Poland rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Poland
05101520186719422018

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 20 against 20 in Poland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 96 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Poland ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 9 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Poland Difference Ahead
1910s 17 18 1 Poland
1920s 20 13.6 6.4 Luxembourg
1930s 20 6.1 13.9 Luxembourg
1940s 20 4.4 15.6 Luxembourg
1950s 20 3 17 Luxembourg
1960s 20 3 17 Luxembourg
1970s 20 3 17 Luxembourg
1980s 20 4.3 15.7 Luxembourg
1990s 20 18.2 1.8 Luxembourg
2000s 20 19.8 0.2 Luxembourg
2010s 20 20 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Luxembourg or Poland?
Luxembourg, at 20 against 20 in Poland as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Luxembourg and Poland?
0, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Poland?
96 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
How do Luxembourg and Poland rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).