Lithuania vs Luxembourg: Distribution of Democracy Index

Lithuania
20
in 2018
Luxembourg
20
in 2018
Lithuania rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
05101520186719422018

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 20 against 20 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.

Across all 96 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1910s 14 17 3 Luxembourg
1920s 10.4 20 9.6 Luxembourg
1930s 1.5 20 18.5 Luxembourg
1940s 1 20 19 Luxembourg
1950s 2.4 20 17.6 Luxembourg
1960s 3 20 17 Luxembourg
1970s 3 20 17 Luxembourg
1980s 3.4 20 16.6 Luxembourg
1990s 19 20 1 Luxembourg
2000s 20 20 0
2010s 20 20 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Lithuania or Luxembourg?
Lithuania, at 20 against 20 in Luxembourg as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Lithuania and Luxembourg?
0, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Luxembourg?
96 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
How do Lithuania and Luxembourg rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Lithuania ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).