Latvia vs United Kingdom: Distribution of Democracy Index
Latvia
18
in 2018
United Kingdom
18
in 2018
Latvia rank
52nd
United Kingdom rank
52nd
Distribution of Democracy Index over time
- Latvia
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 18 against 18 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
Across all 99 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 52nd and United Kingdom ranks 52nd of 168 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 17 | 19.6 | 2.6 | United Kingdom |
| 1930s | 7.4 | 20 | 12.6 | United Kingdom |
| 1940s | 1 | 20 | 19 | United Kingdom |
| 1950s | 2.4 | 20 | 17.6 | United Kingdom |
| 1960s | 3 | 20 | 17 | United Kingdom |
| 1970s | 3 | 20 | 17 | United Kingdom |
| 1980s | 3.4 | 20 | 16.6 | United Kingdom |
| 1990s | 17.2 | 20 | 2.8 | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | 18 | 20 | 2 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 18 | 19.33 | 1.33 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Latvia or United Kingdom?
- Latvia, at 18 against 18 in United Kingdom as of 2018.
- What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Latvia and United Kingdom?
- 0, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and United Kingdom?
- 99 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and United Kingdom rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
- Latvia ranks 52nd and United Kingdom ranks 52nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).