South Korea vs Myanmar: Distribution of Democracy Index

South Korea
18
in 2018
Myanmar
18
in 2018
South Korea rank
52nd
Myanmar rank
52nd

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • South Korea
  • Myanmar
05101520194819832018

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 18 against 18 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 71 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Myanmar ahead.

South Korea ranks 52nd and Myanmar ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 6 and Myanmar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Myanmar Difference Ahead
1940s 7 16 9 Myanmar
1950s 6.2 15 8.8 Myanmar
1960s 11.5 5.6 5.9 South Korea
1970s 4.1 1.8 2.3 South Korea
1980s 7.5 2 5.5 South Korea
1990s 16.4 5 11.4 South Korea
2000s 18 4.4 13.6 South Korea
2010s 18 10.89 7.11 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, South Korea or Myanmar?
South Korea, at 18 against 18 in Myanmar as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between South Korea and Myanmar?
0, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Myanmar?
71 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
How do South Korea and Myanmar rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
South Korea ranks 52nd and Myanmar ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).