Japan vs Spain: Distribution of Democracy Index

Japan
20
in 2018
Spain
20
in 2018
Japan rank
1st
Spain rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Japan
  • Spain
05101520180019092018

How they compare

Japan currently reports 20 against 20 in Spain, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 206 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Spain ahead.

Japan ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 22 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 8 and Spain in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Spain Difference Ahead
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 1 1 Spain
1820s 0 4.6 4.6 Spain
1830s 0 5.8 5.8 Spain
1840s 0 8.5 8.5 Spain
1850s 0.3 5.5 5.2 Spain
1860s 7.4 4.6 2.8 Japan
1870s 11 9.1 1.9 Japan
1880s 11 14 3 Spain
1890s 11 14.5 3.5 Spain
1900s 11 16 5 Spain
1910s 11 16 5 Spain
1920s 11 7.4 3.6 Japan
1930s 11 15 4 Spain
1940s 11 3 8 Japan
1950s 20 3 17 Japan
1960s 20 3 17 Japan
1970s 20 8.6 11.4 Japan
1980s 20 19.8 0.2 Japan
1990s 20 20 0
2000s 20 20 0
2010s 20 20 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Japan or Spain?
Japan, at 20 against 20 in Spain as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Japan and Spain?
0, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Spain?
206 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2018.
How do Japan and Spain rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Japan ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).