Italy vs Uruguay: Distribution of Democracy Index

Italy
20
in 2018
Uruguay
20
in 2018
Italy rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Italy
  • Uruguay
05101520183019242018

How they compare

Italy currently reports 20 against 20 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 158 shared years of data; in 1861 it was Uruguay ahead.

Italy ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Uruguay Difference Ahead
1860s 6 7 1 Uruguay
1870s 6 7 1 Uruguay
1880s 6 7 1 Uruguay
1890s 6 7 1 Uruguay
1900s 9 8.8 0.2 Italy
1910s 9 12.1 3.1 Uruguay
1920s 5 13 8 Uruguay
1930s 1 11.2 10.2 Uruguay
1940s 10.8 10 0.8 Italy
1950s 20 16.4 3.6 Italy
1960s 20 18 2 Italy
1970s 20 5.4 14.6 Italy
1980s 20 11.1 8.9 Italy
1990s 20 20 0
2000s 20 20 0
2010s 20 20 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Italy or Uruguay?
Italy, at 20 against 20 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Italy and Uruguay?
0, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Uruguay?
158 years are reported by both, from 1861 to 2018.
How do Italy and Uruguay rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Italy ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).