Guatemala vs Korea, Rep.: Distribution of Democracy Index

Guatemala
18
in 2018
Korea, Rep.
18
in 2018
Guatemala rank
52nd
Korea, Rep. rank
52nd

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Guatemala
  • Korea, Rep.
05101520183919282018

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 18 against 18 in Korea, Rep., a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 71 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 52nd and Korea, Rep. ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Korea, Rep. in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Korea, Rep. Difference Ahead
1940s 15 7 8 Guatemala
1950s 7.4 6.2 1.2 Guatemala
1960s 8.2 11.5 3.3 Korea, Rep.
1970s 8.2 4.1 4.1 Guatemala
1980s 8.1 7.5 0.6 Guatemala
1990s 15 16.4 1.4 Korea, Rep.
2000s 18 18 0
2010s 18 18 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Guatemala or Korea, Rep.?
Guatemala, at 18 against 18 in Korea, Rep. as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Guatemala and Korea, Rep.?
0, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Korea, Rep.?
71 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
How do Guatemala and Korea, Rep. rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Guatemala ranks 52nd and Korea, Rep. ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).