Dominican Republic vs Tunisia: Distribution of Democracy Index
Dominican Republic
17
in 2018
Tunisia
17
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
70th
Tunisia rank
70th
Distribution of Democracy Index over time
- Dominican Republic
- Tunisia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 17 against 17 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1956 it was Tunisia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 168 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 2.25 | 1.25 | Tunisia |
| 1960s | 7 | 1 | 6 | Dominican Republic |
| 1970s | 8.6 | 1.3 | 7.3 | Dominican Republic |
| 1980s | 15 | 2.6 | 12.4 | Dominican Republic |
| 1990s | 16.2 | 6.1 | 10.1 | Dominican Republic |
| 2000s | 18 | 6.2 | 11.8 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 17.67 | 15.11 | 2.56 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Dominican Republic or Tunisia?
- Dominican Republic, at 17 against 17 in Tunisia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Dominican Republic and Tunisia?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1956 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Tunisia rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
- Dominican Republic ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).