Denmark vs Luxembourg: Distribution of Democracy Index

Denmark
20
in 2018
Luxembourg
20
in 2018
Denmark rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Denmark
  • Luxembourg
05101520180019092018

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 20 against 20 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 147 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1860s 9 7 2 Denmark
1870s 7 7 0 β€”
1880s 7 12 5 Luxembourg
1890s 7 17 10 Luxembourg
1900s 11.1 17 5.9 Luxembourg
1910s 18.5 17 1.5 Denmark
1920s 20 20 0 β€”
1930s 20 20 0 β€”
1940s 20 20 0 β€”
1950s 20 20 0 β€”
1960s 20 20 0 β€”
1970s 20 20 0 β€”
1980s 20 20 0 β€”
1990s 20 20 0 β€”
2000s 20 20 0 β€”
2010s 20 20 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Denmark or Luxembourg?
Denmark, at 20 against 20 in Luxembourg as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Denmark and Luxembourg?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Luxembourg?
147 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2018.
How do Denmark and Luxembourg rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Denmark ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).