Denmark vs Japan: Distribution of Democracy Index

Denmark
20
in 2018
Japan
20
in 2018
Denmark rank
1st
Japan rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Denmark
  • Japan
05101520180019092018

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 20 against 20 in Japan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 207 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Japan ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 8 and Japan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Japan Difference Ahead
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0.6 0 0.6 Denmark
1840s 2.1 0 2.1 Denmark
1850s 12 0.3 11.7 Denmark
1860s 10.8 7.4 3.4 Denmark
1870s 7 11 4 Japan
1880s 7 11 4 Japan
1890s 7 11 4 Japan
1900s 11.1 11 0.1 Denmark
1910s 18.5 11 7.5 Denmark
1920s 20 11 9 Denmark
1930s 20 11 9 Denmark
1950s 20 20 0 β€”
1960s 20 20 0 β€”
1970s 20 20 0 β€”
1980s 20 20 0 β€”
1990s 20 20 0 β€”
2000s 20 20 0 β€”
2010s 20 20 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Denmark or Japan?
Denmark, at 20 against 20 in Japan as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Denmark and Japan?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
207 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2018.
How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Denmark ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).