Chile vs Norway: Distribution of Democracy Index

Chile
20
in 2018
Norway
20
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Norway rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Chile
  • Norway
5101520181419162018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 20 against 20 in Norway, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 196 shared years of data; in 1818 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 1st and Norway ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 9 and Norway in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Norway Difference Ahead
1810s 5 3 2 Chile
1820s 5 3 2 Chile
1830s 5 3 2 Chile
1840s 5 3 2 Chile
1850s 9.5 3 6.5 Chile
1860s 10 3 7 Chile
1870s 11.8 5.1 6.7 Chile
1880s 13.4 7.2 6.2 Chile
1890s 13.2 10.4 2.8 Chile
1900s 13 20 7 Norway
1910s 13 20 7 Norway
1920s 10.2 20 9.8 Norway
1930s 10 20 10 Norway
1940s 12 20 8 Norway
1950s 12.6 20 7.4 Norway
1960s 15.6 20 4.4 Norway
1970s 6.9 20 13.1 Norway
1980s 5.6 20 14.4 Norway
1990s 18 20 2 Norway
2000s 19.4 20 0.6 Norway
2010s 20 20 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Chile or Norway?
Chile, at 20 against 20 in Norway as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Chile and Norway?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Norway?
196 years are reported by both, from 1818 to 2018.
How do Chile and Norway rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Chile ranks 1st and Norway ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).