Chile vs Japan: Distribution of Democracy Index

Chile
20
in 2018
Japan
20
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Japan rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Chile
  • Japan
05101520180019092018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 20 against 20 in Japan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 194 shared years of data; in 1818 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 12 and Japan in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Japan Difference Ahead
1810s 5 0 5 Chile
1820s 5 0 5 Chile
1830s 5 0 5 Chile
1840s 5 0 5 Chile
1850s 9.5 0.3 9.2 Chile
1860s 10 7.4 2.6 Chile
1870s 11.8 11 0.8 Chile
1880s 13.4 11 2.4 Chile
1890s 13.2 11 2.2 Chile
1900s 13 11 2 Chile
1910s 13 11 2 Chile
1920s 10.2 11 0.8 Japan
1930s 10 11 1 Japan
1940s 12 11 1 Chile
1950s 12.75 20 7.25 Japan
1960s 15.6 20 4.4 Japan
1970s 6.9 20 13.1 Japan
1980s 5.6 20 14.4 Japan
1990s 18 20 2 Japan
2000s 19.4 20 0.6 Japan
2010s 20 20 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Chile or Japan?
Chile, at 20 against 20 in Japan as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Chile and Japan?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Japan?
194 years are reported by both, from 1818 to 2018.
How do Chile and Japan rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Chile ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).