Central African Republic vs Madagascar: Distribution of Democracy Index
Central African Republic
16
in 2018
Madagascar
16
in 2018
Central African Republic rank
87th
Madagascar rank
87th
Distribution of Democracy Index over time
- Central African Republic
- Madagascar
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 16 against 16 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.
Across all 59 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 87th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 168 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3 | 11 | 8 | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 3 | 6.3 | 3.3 | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 3 | 4 | 1 | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 11.6 | 16.3 | 4.7 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 10.8 | 16.3 | 5.5 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 11.67 | 14.33 | 2.67 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Central African Republic or Madagascar?
- Central African Republic, at 16 against 16 in Madagascar as of 2018.
- What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Central African Republic and Madagascar?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Madagascar?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Central African Republic and Madagascar rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
- Central African Republic ranks 87th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).