Bhutan vs Honduras: Distribution of Democracy Index

Bhutan
17
in 2018
Honduras
17
in 2018
Bhutan rank
70th
Honduras rank
70th

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Bhutan
  • Honduras
051015183919282018

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 17 against 17 in Honduras, a difference of 0.

Across all 108 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 70th and Honduras ranks 70th of 167 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Honduras Difference Ahead
1900s 0 15 15 Honduras
1910s 0 15 15 Honduras
1920s 0 15 15 Honduras
1930s 0 11.8 11.8 Honduras
1940s 0 7 7 Honduras
1950s 0 7.8 7.8 Honduras
1960s 0 9 9 Honduras
1970s 0 9.1 9.1 Honduras
1980s 0 14.9 14.9 Honduras
1990s 0 16.1 16.1 Honduras
2000s 4.1 17 12.9 Honduras
2010s 14.56 17 2.44 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Bhutan or Honduras?
Bhutan, at 17 against 17 in Honduras as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Bhutan and Honduras?
0, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Honduras?
108 years are reported by both, from 1908 to 2018.
How do Bhutan and Honduras rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Bhutan ranks 70th and Honduras ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).