Belarus vs China: Distribution of Democracy Index

Belarus
3
in 2018
China
3
in 2018
Belarus rank
149th
China rank
149th

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Belarus
  • China
05101520180019092018

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 3 against 3 in China, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 208 shared years of data; in 1800 it was China ahead.

Belarus ranks 149th and China ranks 149th of 167 countries.

Across the 22 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 5 and China in 15.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus China Difference Ahead
1800s 0 4 4 China
1810s 0 4 4 China
1820s 0 4 4 China
1830s 0 4 4 China
1840s 0 4 4 China
1850s 0 4 4 China
1860s 0 4 4 China
1870s 0 4 4 China
1880s 0 4 4 China
1890s 0 4 4 China
1900s 1.8 4 2.2 China
1910s 5.5 6.2 0.7 China
1920s 3.9 5 1.1 China
1930s 1.43 5 3.57 China
1940s 1 4.25 3.25 China
1950s 2.4 2 0.4 Belarus
1960s 3 1.7 1.3 Belarus
1970s 3 2.4 0.6 Belarus
1980s 3.4 3 0.4 Belarus
1990s 9.8 3 6.8 Belarus
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Belarus or China?
Belarus, at 3 against 3 in China as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Belarus and China?
0, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China?
208 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2018.
How do Belarus and China rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Belarus ranks 149th and China ranks 149th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).