Austria vs Japan: Distribution of Democracy Index

Austria
20
in 2018
Japan
20
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Japan rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Austria
  • Japan
05101520180019092018

How they compare

Austria currently reports 20 against 20 in Japan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 211 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Japan ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 22 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Japan Difference Ahead
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0.8 0 0.8 Austria
1850s 4 0.3 3.7 Austria
1860s 5.8 7.4 1.6 Japan
1870s 6 11 5 Japan
1880s 6 11 5 Japan
1890s 6 11 5 Japan
1900s 6 11 5 Japan
1910s 7.2 11 3.8 Japan
1920s 18 11 7 Austria
1930s 8.7 11 2.3 Japan
1940s 10 11 1 Japan
1950s 20 20 0 β€”
1960s 20 20 0 β€”
1970s 20 20 0 β€”
1980s 20 20 0 β€”
1990s 20 20 0 β€”
2000s 20 20 0 β€”
2010s 20 20 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Austria or Japan?
Austria, at 20 against 20 in Japan as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Austria and Japan?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Japan?
211 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2018.
How do Austria and Japan rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Austria ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).