Austria vs Hungary: Distribution of Democracy Index

Austria
20
in 2018
Hungary
20
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Hungary rank
1st

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Austria
  • Hungary
05101520180019092018

How they compare

Austria currently reports 20 against 20 in Hungary, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 150 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Hungary ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Hungary ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 7 and Hungary in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Hungary Difference Ahead
1860s 6 6 0 β€”
1870s 6 6 0 β€”
1880s 6 6 0 β€”
1890s 6 6 0 β€”
1900s 6 6 0 β€”
1910s 7.2 5.5 1.7 Austria
1920s 18 9 9 Austria
1930s 8.7 9 0.3 Hungary
1940s 15 6.67 8.33 Austria
1950s 20 3 17 Austria
1960s 20 3 17 Austria
1970s 20 3 17 Austria
1980s 20 4.6 15.4 Austria
1990s 20 20 0 β€”
2000s 20 20 0 β€”
2010s 20 20 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Austria or Hungary?
Austria, at 20 against 20 in Hungary as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Austria and Hungary?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Hungary?
150 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2018.
How do Austria and Hungary rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Austria ranks 1st and Hungary ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).