Argentina vs Panama: Distribution of Democracy Index

Argentina
19
in 2018
Panama
19
in 2018
Argentina rank
33rd
Panama rank
33rd

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Argentina
  • Panama
05101520182519212018

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 19 against 19 in Panama, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 33rd and Panama ranks 33rd of 167 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Panama Difference Ahead
1900s 11 7 4 Argentina
1910s 11.8 7 4.8 Argentina
1920s 12 7 5 Argentina
1930s 5.9 7 1.1 Panama
1940s 5.6 7.2 1.6 Panama
1950s 5.9 11.5 5.6 Panama
1960s 9.7 11.8 2.1 Panama
1970s 5.5 3.2 2.3 Argentina
1980s 13 5.2 7.8 Argentina
1990s 17.1 18.6 1.5 Panama
2000s 18 19 1 Panama
2010s 18.44 19 0.5556 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Argentina or Panama?
Argentina, at 19 against 19 in Panama as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Argentina and Panama?
0, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Panama?
116 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2018.
How do Argentina and Panama rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Argentina ranks 33rd and Panama ranks 33rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).