Argentina vs Czechia: Distribution of Democracy Index

Argentina
19
in 2018
Czechia
19
in 2018
Argentina rank
33rd
Czechia rank
33rd

Distribution of Democracy Index over time

  • Argentina
  • Czechia
05101520182519212018

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 19 against 19 in Czechia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Czechia ahead.

Argentina ranks 33rd and Czechia ranks 33rd of 167 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Czechia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Czechia Difference Ahead
1910s 12 17 5 Czechia
1920s 12 17 5 Czechia
1930s 4.89 16.22 11.33 Czechia
1940s 1.4 10.4 9 Czechia
1950s 5.9 3 2.9 Argentina
1960s 10.67 3 7.67 Argentina
1970s 5.5 3 2.5 Argentina
1980s 13 3.5 9.5 Argentina
1990s 17.1 19.1 2 Czechia
2000s 18 19.6 1.6 Czechia
2010s 18.44 19 0.5556 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Argentina or Czechia?
Argentina, at 19 against 19 in Czechia as of 2018.
What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Argentina and Czechia?
0, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Czechia?
94 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
How do Argentina and Czechia rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
Argentina ranks 33rd and Czechia ranks 33rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Distribution of Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,366 data points, 1800–2018
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).