Algeria vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Distribution of Democracy Index
Algeria
12
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina
10
in 1994
Algeria rank
116th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
119th
Distribution of Democracy Index over time
- Algeria
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 12 against 10 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 2.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Algeria ranks 116th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 119th of 168 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.38 | 3 | 1.62 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1970s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1980s | 1.7 | 5 | 3.3 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 5 | 8 | 3 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher distribution of democracy index, Algeria or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Algeria, at 12 against 10 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2018.
- What is the difference in distribution of democracy index between Algeria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 2, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1994.
- How do Algeria and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for distribution of democracy index?
- Algeria ranks 116th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 119th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Distribution of Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from 0 to 20 (fully democratic).