Guinea-Bissau vs Thailand: Electoral democracy

Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Thailand
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
116th
Thailand rank
116th

Electoral democracy over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Thailand
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Thailand, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 134 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Thailand ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 116th and Thailand ranks 116th of 197 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Thailand Difference Ahead
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0 0 0
1970s 0 0.1 0.1 Thailand
1980s 0 0.2 0.2 Thailand
1990s 0.4 0.9 0.5 Thailand
2000s 0.7 0.7 0
2010s 0.6 0.3 0.3 Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.5 0 0.5 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Guinea-Bissau or Thailand?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Thailand as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Guinea-Bissau and Thailand?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Thailand?
134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Thailand rank globally for electoral democracy?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 116th and Thailand ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the reduced Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy. It distinguishes between non-electoral autocracies, one-party autocracies, multi-party autocracies without elected executive, multi-party autocracies, exclusive democracies, male democracies, and electoral democracies (including full democracies or polyarchies).