Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Electoral democracy

Bangladesh
0
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
116th
Equatorial Guinea rank
116th

Electoral democracy over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 116th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th of 197 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0 0 0
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 1 0 1 Bangladesh
2000s 0.9 0 0.9 Bangladesh
2010s 0.4 0 0.4 Bangladesh
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy, Bangladesh or Equatorial Guinea?
Bangladesh, at 0 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy between Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
0, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for electoral democracy?
Bangladesh ranks 116th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral democracy
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country using the reduced Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy. It distinguishes between non-electoral autocracies, one-party autocracies, multi-party autocracies without elected executive, multi-party autocracies, exclusive democracies, male democracies, and electoral democracies (including full democracies or polyarchies).