Tajikistan vs Palestine, State of: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Tajikistan
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 0.049 against 0.048 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 161st and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 2 and Palestine, State of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.0735 | 0.049 | 0.0245 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 0.0694 | 0.0585 | 0.0109 | Tajikistan |
| 1930s | 0.0319 | 0.058 | 0.0261 | Palestine, State of |
| 1940s | 0.0236 | 0.056 | 0.0324 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Tajikistan or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 0.049 against 0.048 in Tajikistan as of 1948.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Tajikistan and Palestine, State of?
- 0.001, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Tajikistan and Palestine, State of rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Tajikistan ranks 161st and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.