Syria vs Uzbekistan: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Syria
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Syria currently reports 0.166 against 0.154 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.012.
That makes Syria's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Syria ranks 131st and Uzbekistan ranks 134th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Syria averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syria | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.04 | 0.0695 | 0.0295 | Uzbekistan |
| 1930s | 0.0689 | 0.0319 | 0.037 | Syria |
| 1940s | 0.0915 | 0.0237 | 0.0678 | Syria |
| 1950s | 0.1608 | 0.0649 | 0.0959 | Syria |
| 1960s | 0.0566 | 0.0866 | 0.03 | Uzbekistan |
| 1970s | 0.0206 | 0.0756 | 0.055 | Uzbekistan |
| 1980s | 0.021 | 0.1224 | 0.1014 | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 0.021 | 0.081 | 0.06 | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.027 | 0.038 | 0.011 | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.0195 | 0.08 | 0.0605 | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.051 | 0.1565 | 0.1055 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Syria or Uzbekistan?
- Syria, at 0.166 against 0.154 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Syria and Uzbekistan?
- 0.012, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syria and Uzbekistan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Syria and Uzbekistan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Syria ranks 131st and Uzbekistan ranks 134th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.