Spain vs Taiwan: Deliberative Democracy Index

Spain
0.693
in 2025
Taiwan
0.685
in 2025
Spain rank
26th
Taiwan rank
28th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Spain
  • Taiwan
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0.693 against 0.685 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.008.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 26th and Taiwan ranks 28th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 10 and Taiwan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Taiwan Difference Ahead
1900s 0.1007 0.007 0.0937 Spain
1910s 0.102 0.0113 0.0907 Spain
1920s 0.0469 0.034 0.0129 Spain
1930s 0.2312 0.0333 0.1979 Spain
1940s 0.0211 0.0275 0.0064 Taiwan
1950s 0.0222 0.0415 0.0193 Taiwan
1960s 0.031 0.047 0.016 Taiwan
1970s 0.2282 0.0738 0.1544 Spain
1980s 0.7923 0.1428 0.6495 Spain
1990s 0.8028 0.38 0.4228 Spain
2000s 0.7927 0.6927 0.1 Spain
2010s 0.7657 0.6976 0.0681 Spain
2020s 0.7247 0.7235 0.0012 Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Spain or Taiwan?
Spain, at 0.693 against 0.685 in Taiwan as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Spain and Taiwan?
0.008, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Taiwan?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Spain and Taiwan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Spain ranks 26th and Taiwan ranks 28th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.