Russian Federation vs Palestine, State of: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Russian Federation
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0.059 against 0.049 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.01.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Palestine, State of's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 158th and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 2 and Palestine, State of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.0735 | 0.049 | 0.0245 | Russian Federation |
| 1920s | 0.0694 | 0.0585 | 0.0109 | Russian Federation |
| 1930s | 0.0319 | 0.058 | 0.0261 | Palestine, State of |
| 1940s | 0.0236 | 0.056 | 0.0324 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Russian Federation or Palestine, State of?
- Russian Federation, at 0.059 against 0.049 in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Russian Federation and Palestine, State of?
- 0.01, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Russian Federation and Palestine, State of rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Russian Federation ranks 158th and Palestine, State of ranks 160th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.