Russia vs Tajikistan: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Russia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Russia currently reports 0.059 against 0.048 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.011.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Russia ranks 158th and Tajikistan ranks 161st of 175 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.034 | 0.034 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.0634 | 0.0634 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0.0694 | 0.0694 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0.0319 | 0.0319 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.0237 | 0.0237 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.0649 | 0.0649 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.0866 | 0.0866 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0.0756 | 0.0756 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0.1224 | 0.1224 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.3491 | 0.0976 | 0.2515 | Russia |
| 2000s | 0.2565 | 0.0961 | 0.1604 | Russia |
| 2010s | 0.1768 | 0.0589 | 0.1179 | Russia |
| 2020s | 0.0905 | 0.047 | 0.0435 | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Russia or Tajikistan?
- Russia, at 0.059 against 0.048 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Russia and Tajikistan?
- 0.011, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Tajikistan?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Russia and Tajikistan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Russia ranks 158th and Tajikistan ranks 161st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.