Paraguay vs Ukraine: Deliberative Democracy Index
Paraguay
0.315
in 2025
Ukraine
0.326
in 2025
Paraguay rank
92nd
Ukraine rank
90th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Paraguay
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 0.326 against 0.315 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.011.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 92nd and Ukraine ranks 90th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.0465 | 0.025 | 0.0215 | Paraguay |
| 1950s | 0.0291 | 0.0649 | 0.0358 | Ukraine |
| 1960s | 0.0201 | 0.0866 | 0.0665 | Ukraine |
| 1970s | 0.0204 | 0.0756 | 0.0552 | Ukraine |
| 1980s | 0.0236 | 0.1224 | 0.0988 | Ukraine |
| 1990s | 0.255 | 0.3108 | 0.0558 | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 0.3398 | 0.3572 | 0.0174 | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 0.3643 | 0.3426 | 0.0217 | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0.3333 | 0.3635 | 0.0302 | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Paraguay or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 0.326 against 0.315 in Paraguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Paraguay and Ukraine?
- 0.011, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Ukraine?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do Paraguay and Ukraine rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Paraguay ranks 92nd and Ukraine ranks 90th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.