Pakistan vs Rwanda: Deliberative Democracy Index
Pakistan
0.182
in 2025
Rwanda
0.182
in 2025
Pakistan rank
123rd
Rwanda rank
123rd
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Pakistan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.182 against 0.182 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 123rd and Rwanda ranks 123rd of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 11 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.048 | 0.004 | 0.044 | Pakistan |
| 1920s | 0.0566 | 0.004 | 0.0526 | Pakistan |
| 1930s | 0.0685 | 0.004 | 0.0645 | Pakistan |
| 1940s | 0.1109 | 0.004 | 0.1069 | Pakistan |
| 1950s | 0.1368 | 0.0055 | 0.1313 | Pakistan |
| 1960s | 0.0889 | 0.1049 | 0.016 | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0.1592 | 0.0724 | 0.0868 | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 0.105 | 0.0998 | 0.0052 | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 0.187 | 0.1462 | 0.0408 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.2442 | 0.1731 | 0.0711 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.3006 | 0.2019 | 0.0987 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.2447 | 0.1982 | 0.0465 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Pakistan or Rwanda?
- Pakistan, at 0.182 against 0.182 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Pakistan and Rwanda?
- 0, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Pakistan ranks 123rd and Rwanda ranks 123rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.