Niger vs Philippines: Deliberative Democracy Index
Niger
0.253
in 2025
Philippines
0.251
in 2025
Niger rank
102nd
Philippines rank
103rd
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Niger
- Philippines
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0.253 against 0.251 in Philippines, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Philippines ahead.
Niger ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 103rd of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.027 | 0.1639 | 0.1369 | Philippines |
| 1930s | 0.027 | 0.1849 | 0.1579 | Philippines |
| 1940s | 0.0272 | 0.174 | 0.1468 | Philippines |
| 1950s | 0.0292 | 0.3015 | 0.2723 | Philippines |
| 1960s | 0.063 | 0.3185 | 0.2555 | Philippines |
| 1970s | 0.0522 | 0.1316 | 0.0794 | Philippines |
| 1980s | 0.0517 | 0.2213 | 0.1696 | Philippines |
| 1990s | 0.3004 | 0.4959 | 0.1955 | Philippines |
| 2000s | 0.4364 | 0.4309 | 0.0055 | Niger |
| 2010s | 0.4994 | 0.4292 | 0.0702 | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.383 | 0.2952 | 0.0878 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Niger or Philippines?
- Niger, at 0.253 against 0.251 in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Niger and Philippines?
- 0.002, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Philippines?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Niger and Philippines rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Niger ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 103rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.