Moldova vs Mongolia: Deliberative Democracy Index
Moldova
0.442
in 2025
Mongolia
0.448
in 2025
Moldova rank
67th
Mongolia rank
66th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Moldova
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.448 against 0.442 in Moldova, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 95 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 67th and Mongolia ranks 66th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 6 and Mongolia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.0644 | 0.0183 | 0.0461 | Moldova |
| 1940s | 0.0237 | 0.0365 | 0.0128 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 0.0649 | 0.0476 | 0.0173 | Moldova |
| 1960s | 0.0866 | 0.066 | 0.0206 | Moldova |
| 1970s | 0.0756 | 0.0607 | 0.0149 | Moldova |
| 1980s | 0.1224 | 0.0618 | 0.0606 | Moldova |
| 1990s | 0.3264 | 0.5469 | 0.2205 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.2699 | 0.5771 | 0.3072 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.4352 | 0.5639 | 0.1287 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.5608 | 0.4353 | 0.1255 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Moldova or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.448 against 0.442 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Moldova and Mongolia?
- 0.006, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Mongolia?
- 95 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Mongolia rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Moldova ranks 67th and Mongolia ranks 66th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.