Mexico vs Niger: Deliberative Democracy Index
Mexico
0.246
in 2025
Niger
0.253
in 2025
Mexico rank
105th
Niger rank
102nd
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Mexico
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0.253 against 0.246 in Mexico, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 105th and Niger ranks 102nd of 175 regions.
Across the 11 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 10 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.1174 | 0.027 | 0.0904 | Mexico |
| 1930s | 0.1226 | 0.027 | 0.0956 | Mexico |
| 1940s | 0.1301 | 0.0272 | 0.1029 | Mexico |
| 1950s | 0.1343 | 0.0292 | 0.1051 | Mexico |
| 1960s | 0.1185 | 0.063 | 0.0555 | Mexico |
| 1970s | 0.1411 | 0.0522 | 0.0889 | Mexico |
| 1980s | 0.191 | 0.0517 | 0.1393 | Mexico |
| 1990s | 0.3333 | 0.3004 | 0.0329 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 0.5409 | 0.4364 | 0.1045 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.5035 | 0.4994 | 0.0041 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0.333 | 0.383 | 0.05 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Mexico or Niger?
- Niger, at 0.253 against 0.246 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Mexico and Niger?
- 0.007, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Niger?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Niger rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Mexico ranks 105th and Niger ranks 102nd of 175 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.