Mauritius vs Poland: Deliberative Democracy Index
Mauritius
0.663
in 2025
Poland
0.653
in 2025
Mauritius rank
32nd
Poland rank
34th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Mauritius
- Poland
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.663 against 0.653 in Poland, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 103 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Poland ahead.
Mauritius ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 34th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Poland in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.1485 | 0.2425 | 0.094 | Poland |
| 1920s | 0.1556 | 0.3596 | 0.204 | Poland |
| 1930s | 0.1642 | 0.1537 | 0.0106 | Mauritius |
| 1940s | 0.216 | 0.027 | 0.189 | Mauritius |
| 1950s | 0.2824 | 0.0338 | 0.2486 | Mauritius |
| 1960s | 0.404 | 0.0433 | 0.3607 | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 0.5906 | 0.0449 | 0.5457 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 0.6438 | 0.0767 | 0.5671 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 0.6624 | 0.7417 | 0.0793 | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.6767 | 0.7321 | 0.0554 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.6326 | 0.6338 | 0.0012 | Poland |
| 2020s | 0.4645 | 0.4715 | 0.007 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Mauritius or Poland?
- Mauritius, at 0.663 against 0.653 in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Mauritius and Poland?
- 0.01, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Poland?
- 103 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Poland rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Mauritius ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 34th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.