Malta vs Suriname: Deliberative Democracy Index

Malta
0.642
in 2025
Suriname
0.62
in 2025
Malta rank
38th
Suriname rank
40th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Malta
  • Suriname
00.20.40.6190019622025

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.642 against 0.62 in Suriname, a difference of 0.022.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 38th and Suriname ranks 40th of 175 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Suriname Difference Ahead
1900s 0.199 0.1037 0.0953 Malta
1910s 0.199 0.103 0.096 Malta
1920s 0.2702 0.104 0.1662 Malta
1930s 0.2145 0.1106 0.1039 Malta
1940s 0.2619 0.1341 0.1278 Malta
1950s 0.4114 0.3745 0.0369 Malta
1960s 0.4152 0.3954 0.0198 Malta
1970s 0.5072 0.4501 0.0571 Malta
1980s 0.5225 0.1623 0.3602 Malta
1990s 0.6461 0.5824 0.0637 Malta
2000s 0.666 0.6174 0.0486 Malta
2010s 0.6467 0.5986 0.0481 Malta
2020s 0.6333 0.6008 0.0325 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Malta or Suriname?
Malta, at 0.642 against 0.62 in Suriname as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Malta and Suriname?
0.022, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Suriname?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Malta and Suriname rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Malta ranks 38th and Suriname ranks 40th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.