Mali vs Zimbabwe: Deliberative Democracy Index

Mali
0.208
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.22
in 2025
Mali rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
113th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Mali
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.40.5190019622025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.22 against 0.208 in Mali, a difference of 0.012.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mali ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1900s 0.014 0.027 0.013 Zimbabwe
1910s 0.014 0.0274 0.0134 Zimbabwe
1920s 0.0149 0.0478 0.0329 Zimbabwe
1930s 0.015 0.059 0.044 Zimbabwe
1940s 0.0253 0.0579 0.0326 Zimbabwe
1950s 0.0453 0.0854 0.0401 Zimbabwe
1960s 0.1622 0.0859 0.0763 Mali
1970s 0.0417 0.0773 0.0356 Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0738 0.258 0.1842 Zimbabwe
1990s 0.4078 0.2589 0.1489 Mali
2000s 0.4899 0.2002 0.2897 Mali
2010s 0.4247 0.2356 0.1891 Mali
2020s 0.2518 0.2242 0.0277 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Mali or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.22 against 0.208 in Mali as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Mali and Zimbabwe?
0.012, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Mali ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.