Mali vs Serbia: Deliberative Democracy Index
Mali
0.208
in 2025
Serbia
0.208
in 2025
Mali rank
115th
Serbia rank
115th
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Mali
- Serbia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0.208 against 0.208 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Serbia ahead.
Mali ranks 115th and Serbia ranks 115th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 4 and Serbia in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.014 | 0.1011 | 0.0871 | Serbia |
| 1910s | 0.014 | 0.0973 | 0.0833 | Serbia |
| 1920s | 0.0149 | 0.135 | 0.1201 | Serbia |
| 1930s | 0.015 | 0.1279 | 0.1129 | Serbia |
| 1940s | 0.0253 | 0.0417 | 0.0164 | Serbia |
| 1950s | 0.0453 | 0.0742 | 0.0289 | Serbia |
| 1960s | 0.1622 | 0.096 | 0.0662 | Mali |
| 1970s | 0.0417 | 0.0969 | 0.0552 | Serbia |
| 1980s | 0.0738 | 0.1153 | 0.0415 | Serbia |
| 1990s | 0.4078 | 0.1321 | 0.2757 | Mali |
| 2000s | 0.4899 | 0.5165 | 0.0266 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.4247 | 0.3404 | 0.0843 | Mali |
| 2020s | 0.2518 | 0.2062 | 0.0457 | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Mali or Serbia?
- Mali, at 0.208 against 0.208 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Mali and Serbia?
- 0, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Serbia?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Mali and Serbia rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Mali ranks 115th and Serbia ranks 115th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.