Maldives vs Mongolia: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Maldives
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.448 against 0.416 in Maldives, a difference of 0.032.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Mongolia ahead.
Maldives ranks 69th and Mongolia ranks 66th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.014 | 0.0183 | 0.0043 | Mongolia |
| 1920s | 0.014 | 0.0442 | 0.0302 | Mongolia |
| 1930s | 0.0304 | 0.0438 | 0.0134 | Mongolia |
| 1940s | 0.0362 | 0.0365 | 0.0003 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 0.036 | 0.0476 | 0.0116 | Mongolia |
| 1960s | 0.0379 | 0.066 | 0.0281 | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 0.0418 | 0.0607 | 0.0189 | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 0.029 | 0.0618 | 0.0328 | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 0.0305 | 0.5469 | 0.5164 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.1479 | 0.5771 | 0.4292 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.3013 | 0.5639 | 0.2626 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.4408 | 0.4353 | 0.0055 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Maldives or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.448 against 0.416 in Maldives as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Maldives and Mongolia?
- 0.032, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Mongolia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Maldives and Mongolia rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Maldives ranks 69th and Mongolia ranks 66th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.