Libya vs Niger: Deliberative Democracy Index
Libya
0.261
in 2025
Niger
0.253
in 2025
Libya rank
100th
Niger rank
102nd
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Libya
- Niger
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.261 against 0.253 in Niger, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Niger ahead.
Libya ranks 100th and Niger ranks 102nd of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.004 | 0.027 | 0.023 | Niger |
| 1940s | 0.004 | 0.027 | 0.023 | Niger |
| 1950s | 0.0467 | 0.0294 | 0.0172 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.0515 | 0.063 | 0.0115 | Niger |
| 1970s | 0.024 | 0.0522 | 0.0282 | Niger |
| 1980s | 0.023 | 0.0517 | 0.0287 | Niger |
| 1990s | 0.0345 | 0.3004 | 0.2659 | Niger |
| 2000s | 0.0424 | 0.4364 | 0.394 | Niger |
| 2010s | 0.2326 | 0.4994 | 0.2668 | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.2323 | 0.383 | 0.1507 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Libya or Niger?
- Libya, at 0.261 against 0.253 in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Libya and Niger?
- 0.008, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Niger?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Niger rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Libya ranks 100th and Niger ranks 102nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.