Libya vs Morocco: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Libya
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0.278 against 0.261 in Libya, a difference of 0.017.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Morocco ahead.
Libya ranks 100th and Morocco ranks 97th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.004 | 0.016 | 0.012 | Morocco |
| 1940s | 0.004 | 0.016 | 0.012 | Morocco |
| 1950s | 0.0467 | 0.0399 | 0.0068 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.0515 | 0.0771 | 0.0256 | Morocco |
| 1970s | 0.024 | 0.0871 | 0.0631 | Morocco |
| 1980s | 0.023 | 0.1033 | 0.0803 | Morocco |
| 1990s | 0.0345 | 0.1256 | 0.0911 | Morocco |
| 2000s | 0.0424 | 0.2186 | 0.1762 | Morocco |
| 2010s | 0.2326 | 0.2517 | 0.0191 | Morocco |
| 2020s | 0.2323 | 0.2603 | 0.028 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Libya or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 0.278 against 0.261 in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Libya and Morocco?
- 0.017, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Morocco?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Morocco rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Libya ranks 100th and Morocco ranks 97th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.