Latvia vs Spain: Deliberative Democracy Index

Latvia
0.684
in 2025
Spain
0.693
in 2025
Latvia rank
29th
Spain rank
26th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Latvia
  • Spain
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0.693 against 0.684 in Latvia, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Spain ahead.

Latvia ranks 29th and Spain ranks 26th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 5 and Spain in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Spain Difference Ahead
1900s 0.034 0.1007 0.0667 Spain
1910s 0.0634 0.102 0.0386 Spain
1920s 0.4976 0.0469 0.4507 Latvia
1930s 0.2849 0.2312 0.0537 Latvia
1940s 0.0237 0.0211 0.0026 Latvia
1950s 0.0649 0.0222 0.0427 Latvia
1960s 0.0866 0.031 0.0556 Latvia
1970s 0.0756 0.2282 0.1526 Spain
1980s 0.1224 0.7923 0.6699 Spain
1990s 0.5675 0.8028 0.2353 Spain
2000s 0.633 0.7927 0.1597 Spain
2010s 0.6956 0.7657 0.0701 Spain
2020s 0.6892 0.7247 0.0355 Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Latvia or Spain?
Spain, at 0.693 against 0.684 in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Latvia and Spain?
0.009, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Spain?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Spain rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Latvia ranks 29th and Spain ranks 26th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.