Latvia vs Mauritius: Deliberative Democracy Index

Latvia
0.684
in 2025
Mauritius
0.663
in 2025
Latvia rank
29th
Mauritius rank
32nd

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Latvia
  • Mauritius
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.684 against 0.663 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.021.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mauritius ahead.

Latvia ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 32nd of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 9.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1900s 0.034 0.1487 0.1147 Mauritius
1910s 0.0634 0.1485 0.0851 Mauritius
1920s 0.4976 0.1556 0.342 Latvia
1930s 0.2849 0.1669 0.118 Latvia
1940s 0.0237 0.2069 0.1832 Mauritius
1950s 0.0649 0.2824 0.2175 Mauritius
1960s 0.0866 0.404 0.3174 Mauritius
1970s 0.0756 0.5906 0.515 Mauritius
1980s 0.1224 0.6438 0.5214 Mauritius
1990s 0.5675 0.6624 0.0949 Mauritius
2000s 0.633 0.6767 0.0437 Mauritius
2010s 0.6956 0.6326 0.063 Latvia
2020s 0.6892 0.4645 0.2247 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Latvia or Mauritius?
Latvia, at 0.684 against 0.663 in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Latvia and Mauritius?
0.021, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Latvia ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 32nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.