Kyrgyzstan vs Uzbekistan: Deliberative Democracy Index
Deliberative Democracy Index over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.154 against 0.146 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.008.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 105 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 135th and Uzbekistan ranks 134th of 175 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.0694 | 0.0694 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0.0319 | 0.0319 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.0237 | 0.0237 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.0649 | 0.0649 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.0866 | 0.0866 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0.0756 | 0.0756 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0.1224 | 0.1224 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.1838 | 0.081 | 0.1028 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.1925 | 0.038 | 0.1545 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.3606 | 0.08 | 0.2806 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0.2043 | 0.1565 | 0.0478 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Kyrgyzstan or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.154 against 0.146 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan?
- 0.008, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan?
- 105 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 135th and Uzbekistan ranks 134th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.