Kuwait vs Vietnam: Deliberative Democracy Index

Kuwait
0.176
in 2025
Vietnam
0.181
in 2025
Kuwait rank
128th
Vietnam rank
125th

Deliberative Democracy Index over time

  • Kuwait
  • Vietnam
0.10.150.20.250.3190019622025

How they compare

Vietnam currently reports 0.181 against 0.176 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.005.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Kuwait ahead.

Kuwait ranks 128th and Vietnam ranks 125th of 175 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Vietnam Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2087 0.1367 0.072 Kuwait
1980s 0.2389 0.1609 0.078 Kuwait
1990s 0.2602 0.1659 0.0943 Kuwait
2000s 0.2954 0.1854 0.11 Kuwait
2010s 0.3037 0.1834 0.1203 Kuwait
2020s 0.2398 0.1848 0.055 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative democracy index, Kuwait or Vietnam?
Vietnam, at 0.181 against 0.176 in Kuwait as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative democracy index between Kuwait and Vietnam?
0.005, with Vietnam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Vietnam?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Kuwait and Vietnam rank globally for deliberative democracy index?
Kuwait ranks 128th and Vietnam ranks 125th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,734 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.